|
Home >> GMAT >> Essays >> Essay - 91
The following appeared in a proposal from the development office at Platonic
University.
�Because Platonic University has had difficulty in meeting its expenses over the
past three years, we need to find new ways to increase revenues. We should
consider following the example of Greene University, which recently renamed
itself after a donor who gave it $100 million. If Platonic University were to
advertise to its alumni and other wealthy people that it will rename either
individual buildings or the entire university itself after the donors who give the
most money, the amount of donations would undoubtedly increase.�
Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.
In this argument an analogy is drawn between Platonic University and Greene University. The author argues that to solve its economic
problems, Platonic University should follow the example of Greene University, which was recently named after a wealthy donor, and offer
to rename individual buildings or the university itself in exchange for donations. The author believes that since this tactic worked for
Greene it would undoubtedly work for Platonic, and thus provide the much-needed revenue. This argument is questionable for several
reasons.
In the first place, the argument rests upon the assumption that a revenue-producing strategy that works for one university will work for
another as well. However, Greene and Platonic may not be sufficiently similar to warrant this assumption. For example, a small, rural
university is less likely to have alumni who could afford to make significant donations than a large, urban university. Lacking specific
information about the makeup of the universities, and their alumni, it is impossible to assess the likelihood that the strategy employed
by Greene will work for ( )
Page numbers AWA
|
|
